Where is the British Open 2021?
The 2021 Open Championship, also known as the British Open, will return to England, where Royal St. George's in Sandwich will host starting Thursday. The Open was last held in England in 2017, when Jordan Spieth won at Royal Birkdale. CBSSports.comBritish Open 2021 predictions, Open Championship odds: Bryson DeChambeau, Jon Rahm picks from PGA insider
When was the last Open at Royal St Georges?
The last two Opens played in this blustery corner of Kent were in 2003 with Ben Curtis, a 500-1 outsider who had never before seen a British or Irish links course, and Darren Clarke, who went into the 2011 edition ranked 111 in the world but played the golf of his life to finish three clear of his nearest challengers, ... The GuardianRoyal St George’s is toughest Open course with history of surprises
Who wins British Open?
The 2020 British Open was canceled due to the COVID-19 pandemic, so the reigning champion remains Shane Lowry of Ireland. In the 2019 season, Lowry won over Tommy Fleetwood by a six-stroke margin over Tommy Fleetwood. DraftKings NationBritish Open 2021: Past winners, who has won it the most times, why no 2020 winner
After a year off, The Open is back. As the year's final major is played after its one-year break because of COVID-19, it comes with plenty of big, big questions. As always, will the conditions play a factor, meaning will the wind blow and the rain come? Can Jon Rahm go back-to-back in majors? Will Bryson DeChambeau be able to silence all the noise around him? Is there a sleeper hiding in this field?
Let's see what the experts say.
Michael Collins: The style of golf and the knowledge of the fans. We just don't play the "ground game" in the U.S. Fans in the U.K. understand when a shot to within 12 feet or 15 feet is great, whereas in the U.S. we are so used to seeing guys fire at flags and hit it to inches. It's amazing to watch how fast Americans get good at bump-and-run shots, even though they play them only once a year.
In this edition of America's Caddie, Michael Collins travels to the UK to tour The Open Championship host town of Sandwich & talk to 3-time Open winner Sir Nick Faldo. Stream now on ESPN+
Mark Schlabach: Sure, there are scenic golf courses in the U.S., such as Torrey Pines and Pebble Beach, but I'm not sure there's anything here like what we see in The Open rota. The rolling undulation, island-sized bunkers and ankle-deep fescue rough is just so much more appealing to the eye. I like that The Open setups traditionally require a player to use all his skills -- and not just having to blast 350-yard drives to have a chance to win.
Kevin Van Valkenburg: Creativity. Golf is the best sport when it's played on links courses because the young and old stand on equal footing. I want to see half shots and chippy 4-irons into a blustery wind. I want to see players use the contours of a fairway to set up a better approach. I want to see guys chip backward out of bunkers.
Tom VanHaaren: I don't want to say I enjoy watching professional golfers suffer, but as an amateur, it's always nice to see them make some of the mistakes we make. If the weather doesn't cooperate, we usually get to see just how hard golf really is, even for the best in the world. The creativity that is required in those conditions on this style of golf course just makes for a fun watch that can't be recreated elsewhere.
Harig: Bryson is too good to overlook, but you have to wonder about his ability to adapt to this style of play. Remember, this is the rebuilt Bryson, brawny Bryson. He weighed 40 pounds fewer the last time The Open was played in 2019. Now one of his strengths is his ability to launch iron shots high into the air. That typically doesn't work at The Open. It's a ground game that requires playing the humps and bumps. Can Bryson adjust? Certainly he has the ability. But it's a fast turnaround for him.
Collins: Low expectations for Bryson. If he makes the cut, it'd be a mini-win after what we saw out of him in Detroit. DeChambeau likes to hit it high, which is the wrong type of play for an Open. He's not afraid to short-side himself around the greens, which is also the wrong mindset for the Open. What I want to see most from Bryson is joy. Once he finds joy just by being on the course, his results will start to improve.
Schlabach: The fairways at Royal St. George's are supposed to be slightly wider than they were in 2011, when Darren Clarke was one of only four players under par and won by 3 shots. I just can't see DeChambeau staying out of trouble enough to have a chance this week. He's 189th in driving accuracy and 113th in shots gained around the green. Plus, with everything going on around him, it'll give him even more things to think about -- and there's already a lot going on between his ears.
Van Valkenburg: To me, the only way Bryson contends is if he pulls a Tiger Woods at Liverpool and hits irons off every tee. Remember, The Open is where Bryson had his infamous driving-range meltdown because he was so befuddled by all the variables. In a tournament in which a good caddie can save you 3 shots a round, I don't see how he figures it out this week without Tim Tucker.
VanHaaren: I've been saying for a while that there are too many outside distractions for Bryson right now with the feud with Brooks Koepka, splitting with his caddie, all the media attention surrounding him. And he definitely pays attention to all of it. Add that in to the style of play, conditions that he'll have to deal with and trying to break in a new caddie, and I just don't think he'll have a great week.
Harig: Definitely on both. Rahm has played solid all year, and his play at the Memorial before being disqualified was but one hint of what was coming. Obviously the U.S. Open win and the way he finished will be remembered for a long time. And while he didn't win the Scottish Open, a final-round 68 while in contention gives hope to a good week. He finished seventh in his first event following a major win and got in some good links experience in the process.
Make your picks and compete for a chance to win $5,000! Make Your Picks
Collins: Yes and yes. Last week at the Scottish Open, all that was missing was his putter. That's what will show up this week at The Open. Then it just becomes a question of whether he's on the "right side of the draw." Rahm is ready. The question is: Will Mother Nature allow him to get two in a row?
Schlabach: The Spaniard is clearly the best player in the world, and he has slowly adapted to The Open's style of play. After three not-so-great starts, he tied for 11th at Royal Portrush two years ago, when he had three rounds under par. He ranks fifth on tour in greens in regulation (71%) and fourth in birdie average (4.39) and leads all players in shots gained total (2.02) and scoring average (69.6).
Van Valkenburg: I can't go so far as to predict Rahm will win back-to-back majors, in part because luck plays such a big factor in The Open. What if he gets the bad side of the draw? What if he gets a bad bounce or a gust of wind that leads to a maddening double-bogey? But I do think he'll be in the mix. When you hit a booming fade that you can control and you have a great short game, that's a recipe for success in any tournament.
VanHaaren: I think he can, but I don't think he will. I'm really just going off the odds here that it's really difficult to win back-to-back majors. The last to do it was Jordan Spieth when he won the 2015 Masters and went on to win the U.S. Open. Rory McIlroy did it in 2014 when he won The Open and the PGA Championship. Padraig Harrington also won consecutive majors in 2008, also winning The Open and the PGA Championship. So three guys have done it in the past 13 years. I think Rahm will be in the mix and near the top of the leaderboard, but the odds say it's difficult to win again. So I'll say no to the second part of the question.
Harig: Min Woo Lee. Until he won the Scottish Open on Sunday, Lee was having a poor year, with five missed cuts, including four in a row at the start of the season on the European Tour. Only 22, Lee, an Australian, has long been considered to have great potential, having already won the Vic Open in 2020 prior to the pandemic. His reputation is one of a solid ball striker, always helpful in the various Open conditions. And he's arriving at Royal St. George's with plenty of confidence.
Collins: Garrick Higgo. It's unreal to think that three years ago Higgo was ranked 2,006th in the Official World Golf Ranking. Seven wins later -- three so far this year -- the 39th-ranked player in the world comes into his first Open with little fanfare. Maybe it was his missed cuts at the U.S. Open and the Travelers. The last time we saw Garrick was a T-64 in Detroit, which doesn't seem like much. But watching him in person made me think he's back to where he was earlier this year. I expect big things from the young South African this week at Royal St. George's.
Schlabach: Branden Grace. The South African picked up his second Tour victory earlier this season at the Puerto Rico Open. Then he finished in a solo fourth at the Memorial and tied for seventh at the U.S. Open. He has been overshadowed by fellow countryman Louis Oosthuizen in majors, but Grace is the only man to shoot a 62 in a major, in the third round at Royal Birkdale in 2017.
Van Valkenburg: Patrick Reed. There has been so much buzz about Brooks and Bryson this season, I feel like golf's original bad boy has been flying under the radar of late. Is it cheating to call a top-10 player in the world under-the-radar? Probably. But I think this course suits him well, and I've always thought his creative golf brain (which is undeniably great, despite the controversy that's dogged him) was going to get him into contention at multiple Opens. Maybe this is the week he jumps back into the conversation as one of the world's best after a quiet year.
VanHaaren: Harris English hasn't played well at past Opens, but he is on a bit of a hot streak right now. He finished third at the U.S. Open and won the Travelers at the end of June in a playoff. Maybe that doesn't carry over to this week, but he's playing well and not getting a ton of attention heading into the tournament. He has already won twice this year, so why not make a run at it again this week?
Harig: Rahm, of course, is the easy pick. But Xander Schauffele can't be denied for long. He keeps getting into contention at the big tournaments. Of course, he keeps falling short, too. But he had another good tournament at the Scottish Open last week, and it can't hurt to be acclimated to the time zone and similar playing conditions. I don't trust Bryson. It just seems like too much to ask. Too much drama. Too many distractions. A new caddie for someone who relies on the caddie for a lot of feedback can't be good. Nor can DeChambeau's high ball flight, which is going to need major adjusting this week.
Collins: I like Rahm the most, but there is another big name to watch -- Brooks Koepka. And it's not just because of the Bryson turmoil. It's because he's got three top-5s in his past four starts, including at two majors. I don't trust Collin Morikawa. His T-71 last week at the Scottish Open did not inspire confidence for me, since this is his first appearance in The Open. The last thing the kid from Southern California is going to embrace is Open weather. If he is on the wrong side of the draw, forget contending; he'll be going home for the weekend.
Schlabach: Rahm is the obvious choice for the player I trust the most. DeChambeau is probably the player I have the most questions about for reasons such as the turmoil surrounding his caddie, his beef with Koepka and his poor performances in majors since his win at the U.S. Open at Winged Foot. His style of play doesn't fit The Open.
Van Valkenburg: I don't know that I'd ever have the confidence to pick him to win, but Lee Westwood will totally be in contention again. He's just too good with his irons not to be. As for whom I trust the least, I remain confounded by what's going on with Dustin Johnson, who has just one top-10 in his past 10 starts. It feels like grabbing a second major sapped his motivation. We thought he was poised to go on a heater, and he's been just middling ever since. I need to see some results before I start believing again. The Open isn't a place to suddenly find your game.
VanHaaren: I picked Brooks Koepka as the winner in our picks post, so I'll stick with him. Koepka finished fourth in the U.S. Open and second in the PGA Championship. In his past four tournaments, he has missed the cut once and finished top-five in the other three. The player I don't trust is his archnemesis, DeChambeau. For the reasons I listed above, I just think there's too much going on with DeChambeau for him to have the focus to win a major championship like this one right now.
Harig: Rahm. It's probably too obvious, which doesn't always work out well. But Rahm is hard to pass by given the circumstances. His game is in top form and he had a good week at the Scottish Open, where he could get acclimated to the time zone and similar links conditions. And he just won the last major championship, helping free him of any mental burden. Now he's in great shape to go get another one.
Collins: Rahm. What makes him so good? His ability to adapt quickly. Rahm's ballstriking was almost as good last week during the Scottish Open as it was at the U.S. Open. The speed of the greens resulted in abysmal putting. Does anyone doubt he'll make the adjustment at Royal St. George's? Combine fantastic ballstriking with just "good" putting, and Rahmbo wins his second major in a row.
Schlabach: I'll step out on a limb and not pick Rahm. I like Jordan Spieth's chances this week. His ballstriking and touch around the green have helped him on links-style courses. Those are two big reasons he won at Royal Birkdale four years ago. Since he ended a nearly four-year drought without a victory at the Valero Texas Open in May, he hasn't missed a cut and has finished in the top 20 in five of six starts.
Van Valkenburg: Spieth is my pick, even though I certainly don't trust him the way I trust Rahm to contend. I've just felt, even years out, this course was going to be his kind of Open venue. All he needs is a good putting week and he'll be right there. He could have won at St. Andrews and Carnoustie, and he did win at Birkdale. He's played well in two majors this year despite very mediocre putting. I'm sure it will be another wild ride on the roller coaster that is the Spieth Golf Experience, with wild drives and heroic recoveries, long putts made and short putts missed. But if he gets in the mix, I'm back on the Spieth train.
VanHaaren: Koepka. I mentioned his past four tournaments above, but this is also one of the majors he hasn't won yet. He talks about how much the majors mean to him, so he has to start adding more trophies at some point from either The Open or The Masters, and this would be a good place for him to start.
Read full article at ESPN
14 July, 2021 - 02:53pm
Brooks Koepka and Bryson DeChambeau have shared more details on the origins of their ongoing feud ahead of The 149th Open at Royal St George's.
The war of words between the pair has been one of the biggest talking points in golf in recent months, with coverage of the feud being elevated by the infamous leaked footage of Koepka displaying his obvious distain for his rival during the PGA Championship in May.
But the spat actually dates back to an incident during The Northern Trust held at Liberty National in August 2019, when DeChambeau was angered by Koepka's accusations of slow play and sought out his rival for discussions on the matter in the locker room.
Koepka claims they came to "an agreement", although he was furious that DeChambeau had also approached his caddie, Ricky Elliott, to voice his opposition to Koepka's comments. DeChambeau, however, has no recollection of any "agreement".
"We had a conversation at Liberty National, and he didn't hold up his end of the bargain and I didn't like that, so I'll take my shots," said Koepka. "He didn't like that I had mentioned his name in slow play, so we had a conversation in the locker room.
"Then I guess we said something else in the press conference but didn't mention his name in it, and he walked up to Ricky, said something. It was, 'You tell your man if he's got something to say, say it to myself'. I thought that was ironic because he went straight to Ricky.
Get Sky Sports today from just £18 extra a month.
"Ricky told me when I came out, I hit a few putts, and then just walked right over to him, we had a conversation. We both agreed we'd leave each other out of it and wouldn't mention each other, just kind of let it die off, wouldn't mention each other's names, just go about it.
"So then he decided I guess he was going on that little, whatever, playing video games online or whatever and brought my name up and said a few things, so now it's fair game."
Koepka's final comment was a reference to DeChambeau posting a video on social media shortly after Koepka had appeared in ESPN The Magazine's Body Issue two years ago, in which he said "Brooks didn't have any abs".
DeChambeau, who has been targeted by hecklers shouting "Brooks" during his last four starts, was reluctant to go into the specifics of their conversation at Liberty National, although he continues to insist the "back and forth banter" is good for the game.
"He can say whatever he wants," was DeChambeau's abrupt retort when asked about Koepka's comments a few hours earlier. "I think he said something back at Liberty National not upholding something, but I don't know what he's talking about in that regard.
"Maybe that's on me, maybe I didn't. I really don't remember anything about that. We just had a conversation that I really don't know what happened, because we haven't really bantered back and forth until now, so it's like why is that happening now.
The heavyweight Americans also have differing views on the prospect of being paired together at the Ryder Cup in September, with Koepka appearing to rule out teaming up with DeChambeau, who believes the pairing would be "funny".
"I'm not playing with him," said Koepka. "I'm pretty sure we're not going to be paired together, put it that way. I think it's kind of obvious. It doesn't matter. We're not going to be high fiving and having late-night conversations.
DeChambeau countered by suggesting that playing alongside Koepka would not only give Team USA one of their strongest pairings, but it could also be off-putting to their opponents.
"I think it would be kind of funny actually," he said. "I think we'd do well, to be honest. It would create a little interesting vibe for the team or for the guys we're playing against."
14 July, 2021 - 02:30pm
Some of these cookies are necessary to make our site work, while others help us to improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.