What is Halo in f1?
The Halo is a protective barrier that helps to prevent large objects and debris from entering the cockpit of a single-seat racing car. There are specific rules for its construction, and the device is manufactured by three approved companies for the F1 teams to then add to their racing cars. Sunday Times DrivingF1 Halo: What it is, when it was introduced and why
Read full article at Jalopnik
31 December, 1969 - 06:00pm
• The on-track antics between Max Verstappen and Lewis Hamilton boiled over (again) at the 2021 Italian Grand Prix.
• The two championship protagonists collided during the GP, bringing an end to their respective races.
• Verstappen was blamed for the collision.
Sign up for your bi-weekly newsletter and get all the latest and exciting motoring news.
14 September, 2021 - 09:20am
14 September, 2021 - 09:20am
By Chris Medland September 13, 2021 7:02 PM
By Chris Medland | September 13, 2021 7:02 PM ET
Something tells me this won’t be the last time I’m writing a post-race column that is discussing a collision between Lewis Hamilton and Max Verstappen. Stating the obvious, I know.
But I’m glad I’m writing about Verstappen’s penalty and its impact on the Italian Grand Prix and consequently the title battle, rather than something much, much more serious.
Without the Halo, we definitely could be discussing the serious injury or worse of the most successful Formula 1 driver of all time. In an innocuous collision, Hamilton still took a glancing blow to his head from Verstappen’s right rear wheel. The Halo kept the majority of the weight off of Hamilton, but who knows how bad the outcome could have been without the cockpit protection device in place.
If nothing else, it should really serve as a reminder of just how dangerous this sport is, and why even low speed crashes could still have a bad outcome. It’s the whole reason why drivers shouldn’t be willing to have accidents: they’re always at risk, even if it sometimes feels like they’re bulletproof inside the car.
That was one of the main similarities between the two Hamilton/Verstappen collisions, and it also reminds me of a time when another driver who was at Monza this weekend went through a spell doing something similar. There was a period during Felipe Massa’s career – 2011 mainly – when he and Hamilton had numerous small incidents together, but then in their biggest contact, I couldn’t shake the feeling that the Brazilian was more than happy to have a crash.
It was in India towards the end of that year, and I should point out, Massa was usually the one in the right in terms of how an incident was playing out. But on that occasion he turned into a corner with Hamilton on his inside knowing that contact was certain to follow, but that he would once again be the driver in the right.
Sure, you’ve got the high ground, and more of the blame should certainly be attribute to the other driver, but as we saw at Monza, there can be serious outcomes from what don’t appear to be serious incidents.
And as safety in Formula 1 has increased, that willingness to get physical is an attitude that has been likely to rise.
So Verstappen and Hamilton’s run-ins feel a little familiar on that front. Verstappen was entitled to turn in at Silverstone, knowing a collision was more than likely, but he was more in the right than his main rival in that scenario. And the stewards agreed.
In Monza, the reverse was true. Verstappen was never really in a position to complete a clean pass – like Hamilton in Silverstone, he never had the high ground – and Hamilton had fairly showed him the edge of the track in the same way Verstappen did to Hamilton (also fairly) at the second chicane on the opening lap. But Verstappen tried to wedge his car into a position that was never going to end in anything other than a crash unless Hamilton took some unrealistic evasive action.
That’s 1-1 on the scorecards for me, but in both scenarios the contact has come because of a willingness – to some degree – for the driver who is more in the right for it to happen.
And that wasn’t the case at other times this season. Verstappen did allow Hamilton to run him wide in Bahrain at the start of the year; Hamilton did the same when he was on the outside at Imola and Barcelona. The driver on the inside chooses how firmly they push – and they push each other very firmly – but the driver on the outside then tends to have a final choice to make.
Verstappen had the high ground at Silverstone, but that might be a moot point when the car goes back to the garage on the back of a truck. Mark Sutton/Motorsport Images
Add all of that together, and you get one of the main reasons why the two stewards’ decisions that have resulted in penalties have used the word “predominantly”. In both occasions, the stewards have deemed one driver to be at fault more than the other, but not wholly at fault, and so the penalties themselves are relatively lenient.
If you’re going to hand out a penalty in the race – one that has a sporting impact, so not a reprimand or warning – then a five-second time penalty is the most lenient you can be. The next on the scale is 10 seconds, and that’s what Hamilton got in Silverstone.
Similarly, if a driver who is going to be penalized has already retired from the race and the time penalty option therefore doesn’t exist, a grid penalty is the standard course of action. The stewards have the ability to choose any number of positions, but three and five places are the most common, so you could even argue Verstappen’s penalty was the most lenient option. (Or if you include one place and two places, it’s certainly one of the least harsh).
Where there seems to be a lot of anger among fans is the fact that either driver is getting blamed at all. In such a fierce title fight, many are taking sides and then with that bias they are enraged when their driver is apportioned the majority of the blame, and similarly apoplectic when the opposite is true because apparently not enough blame is given. Go figure.
The stewards are always different at each race but they’ve set out their stall that they will penalize a driver if they feel they’re predominantly at fault, rather than let the two of them have run-in after run-in. And Max might be in the lead of the championship, but if anyone needs to change right now it’s him.
His lead is five points, but had he yielded at Silverstone then that advantage would likely be 23, if not 28 had he been able to find a way past Hamilton. Similarly, after Monza it could have been cut by a few points, or Verstappen might have extended it had he managed to overtake the Mercedes later on. The two McLarens ahead certainly didn’t make that an impossible notion.
That’s all before we even get to see how Russia pans out, where Hamilton will fancy his chances of gaining ground due to Verstappen’s grid penalty.
Hypothetical though it all is, there’s a lot of points Verstappen has likely lost simply by being involved in the incidents. Whether it’s a collision where he’s been more to blame or not, it has ended up costing him when it perhaps didn’t need to. When both drivers look back at what they could have done differently in 2021, Hamilton might not change too much, but Verstappen should want to.
That’s not to say he’s been in the wrong each time. Far from it. But being right and having an accident can lead to major consequences that cost you championships.
While studying Sports Journalism at the University of Central Lancashire, Chris managed to talk his way into working at the British Grand Prix in 2008 and was retained for three years before joining ESPN F1 as Assistant Editor. After three years at ESPN, a spell as F1 Editor at Crash Media Group was followed by the major task of launching F1i.com’s English-language website and running it as Editor. Present at every race since the start of 2014, he has continued building his freelance portfolio, working with international titles. As well as writing for RACER, he contributes to BBC 5Live and Sky Sports in the UK as well as working with titles in Japan and the Middle East.
Graham Rahal wasn’t a happy person at the conclusion of the Portland Grand Prix, and it’s hard to fault his views on a day where the (…)
The largest autocross event in North America, the Tire Rack SCCA Solo Nationals draws people from far and wide to meet up for several days (…)
Below are provisional results for each of 30 classes that concluded competition Friday during the 48th running of the Tire Rack Solo (…)
Mercedes team principal Toto Wolff believes Max Verstappen’s collision with Lewis Hamilton during Sunday’s Italian Grand Prix was a tactical (…)
Below are provisional results for each of 35 classes that concluded competition Wednesday during the 48th running of the Tire Rack Solo (…)
Greg Anderson had been close so many times before. Since May, Anderson had pursued a historic 97th Pro Stock victory only for something to (…)
McLaren knew it had a chance of winning the Italian Grand Prix once it saw its pace in qualifying on Friday, according to team principal (…)
Jim Liaw has joined Performance Racing Industry (PRI) as the General Manager leading the staff and operations out of the Aliso Viejo, (…)
At the last NTT IndyCar Series race, Pato O’Ward delivered an excellent second-place finish for his Arrow McLaren SP team and took (…)
Powered by WordPress VIP
13 September, 2021 - 11:55am
Especially in the replay and the slow-motion footage, it was clearly visible how the rear tire of Verstappen's car hit the Halo of Hamilton. If the Halo would not have been there, things could have been a lot worse. Mercedes realises this as well.
Mercedes says this in a message on Twitter. Below the text the picture is shown again which makes it clear that things could have gone differently if the Halo would not have been there. Hamilton's team also thanks the FIA for making the sport safe.
© 2021 Autosport International B.V. All rights reserved.
You will be logged out and redirected to the homepage
Thank you for signing up! You can immediately use your account and comment on the news items!
13 September, 2021 - 10:42am
Ross Brawn doubts Max Verstappen and Lewis Hamilton will back off in the remaining races of 2021, but the F1 chief hopes the title won't be decided off the track or "in the barriers".
Three races after their high profile clash at the British Grand Prix in July, Verstappen and Hamilton battled once again last weekend for the same piece of tarmac.
But this time, both drivers came off worse when they slid off the track mid-race at Monza's first chicane and into a costly retirement.
Verstappen was ultimately blamed for the run-off, but Brawn believes that both drivers could have avoided the skirmish.
"Max and Lewis visited the stewards after the race and it was Max who was given the blame – and a three-place grid penalty for Russia - for causing the collision at the first chicane," said Brawn in his post-race column for F1.com.
"Fans will be split, I’m sure. It’s clear both drivers could have avoided it.
"Ultimately I think it’s another consequence of two guys going head to head and not wanting to give inch.
"It’s a shame they ended up in the gravel because it could have shaped up to be a great race – and we were deprived of that.
"I’m interested to see what impact this has on their on-going battle for the title. We have lived through Silverstone which was a major and controversial incident."
Brawn doesn't believe the on-track fracas between Verstappen and Hamilton, or its consequences, will deter the two drivers from butting heads in the remaining rounds given the stakes at play.
"Personally, I wouldn’t say it has changed the dynamic. You’ve got two cockerels in the farmyard at the moment and we are seeing the consequence of it," added Brawn.
"I don’t think either will back off at any moment for the rest of the year but I hope the championship is won on the track not in the barriers or the stewards room."
Keep informed with the latest F1 news, reports and results from F1i.com. Also bringing you live reporting, features, interviews, videos, pictures and classic content.
Add this ID to the plugin's Hide Specific Tweets setting: