Is koepka playing in Ryder Cup?
Koepka will play in his third Ryder Cup at Whistling Straits between 24 September and 26 September. ... Koepka qualified automatically for a formidable United States team to be led by captain Steve Stricker in Wisconsin. The IndependentBrooks Koepka criticises ‘odd’ and ‘hectic’ Ryder Cup schedule
15 September, 2021 - 11:00pm
You could fill up the Library of Congress with theories about why the United States has lost seven of the last nine Ryder Cups. No idea is off limits, no scenario too fanciful. From scripting to spin rates to improper pods to incompatible psychological test scores, if a reason is tangentially plausible, it has been floated by those who watch, follow and obsess over the Ryder Cup.
Ahead of the 2020 Ryder Cup, there's no reason to exasperate ourselves by exploring the myriad possibilities as to why the U.S. has struggled despite so often having the more talented team. Thanks to Brooks Koepka, who sat down for an interview with Golf Digest, we have the primary answer. Koepka, an automatic qualifier for this year's team (his playing status is unknown due to a wrist injury) who played on the 2016 and 2018 teams, said the quiet part out loud.
"It's different. It's hectic. It's a bit odd, if I'm honest," Koepka said of his Ryder Cup experiences. "I don't want to say it's a bad week. We're just so individualized, and everybody has their routine and a different way of doing things, and now it's like, 'OK, we have to have a meeting at this time or go do this or go do that.' It's the opposite of what happens during a major week."
"It's tough," he added. "There are times where I'm like, 'I won my match. I did my job. What do you want from me?' I know how to take responsibility for the shots I hit every week. Now, somebody else hit a bad shot and left me in a bad spot, and I know this hole is a loss. That's new, and you have to change the way you think about things. You go from an individual sport all the time to a team sport one week a year. It's so far from my normal routine."
He went on to say that he missed getting to take naps, go to the gym or decompress by watching TV because those were his routines during major championship weeks (where his record is sterling).
Koepka has made a career feasting on those he might consider mentally inferior athletes, men whose minds get mushy at the thought of ascending to the top of the food chain, players who can't handle the mentally taxing minefields at major championships. So it's a bit of an own goal when he admits how much he struggles to swap a nap for a get-together in team dining to discuss Saturday pairing strategies. He actually sounds a lot like the golfers at whom we normally see him sneer.
All of this would be fine if it existed in a vacuum. Worthy of parody, sure, but ultimately fine. However, Ian Poulter has a garage full of Ferraris to prove the Ryder Cup is not played by individuals in a vacuum.
The idea that mediocre teams can beat great individuals in sports, and especially in golf, is a bit overdramatized for my taste (12 Jon Rahms are pretty much always going to beat any team you could feasibly assemble). Still, it's difficult to ignore the "culture beats talent" flag the European side has flown for one week every two years for the last few decades.
The first problem here is that Koepka has real sway. He's done the thing, subdued the seas, conquered the unknown. His treasure chest is full. He is a genuine badass on the golf course in a world where players like him are seemingly facing extinction. He carries real weight. At this level, major championship trophies are currency, and Koepka has plenty to spend.
Imagine how galvanizing it would be for him to walk in the U.S. team room and take on a real leadership role. Asking captain Steve Stricker where he's needed. Taking youngsters Scottie Scheffler and Harris English under his wing. Leveraging his superstardom for the good of a team he should be leading.
I have no confidence that will happen, of course, but the U.S. has enough bought-in stars (think Justin Thomas and Jordan Spieth), that it probably doesn't matter. If they were structured more like Europe (with Jon Rahm and Rory McIlroy at the top), then they might be cooked.
This leads to the second issue with Koepka's statements, and it's the one that has haunted the U.S. side for nearly 20 years.
If you have to boil down why Europe succeeds at the Ryder Cup to one word, it's trust.
The Europeans trust one another far more than the Americans. This is neither a controversial stance nor a difficult one to land on when you hear what Koepka says. Pick a year, and you'll find something flowing from the U.S. side that has disfigured trust. Even in the only year the U.S. has won in the last decade (2016 at Hazeltine), I left the post-event press conferences believing that the European team had far more trust in one another than the U.S. and that was a Euro team that had just been torched.
So, you might be wondering why trust matters. You're (mostly) hitting your own golf shots, playing your own ball and trying to put together a score. Trust matters because there is a lot going on during a Ryder Cup week. The golf, at times, can seem complementary rather than primary. When there's a lot going on, there's a lot to think about, sort out and consider.
What is the one variable that can change your on-course play the most in a given week? It's your mentality, right? When there's too much mental clutter, too many things you're thinking about besides the golf -- like not knowing with whom you're going to be paired or whether Patrick Reed is going to throw you under the bus or why Koepka and Dustin Johnson aren't speaking or anything else outside of the golf that's in front of you -- your play suffers.
Europe has created a space where trust can co-exist with some of the biggest personalities and egos in sports, even if just for one week. That trust engenders vulnerability, which (when received properly) creates more trust. A cycle of success that leads to lesser teams consistently beating better ones.
"I see the way they support each other, and I see the way that they have this foundation of support amongst each other to lift each other up," Phil Mickelson said recently on the 5 Clubs podcast with Gary Williams. "I see them walking together side-by-side in the fairways and with a vision of solidarity, if you will. I see them helping each other get the best out of each other."
It really is all about trust.
That might seem completely irrelevant as it relates to hitting 4-irons from 225 yards -- the U.S. team has essentially tried to argue that it is for a long time -- but it is not. If you can't completely trust everybody in the room, it becomes extraordinarily difficult to have the mental clarity necessary in a week of chaos like the Ryder Cup. It seems difficult to trust somebody who so brazenly and loudly and even tauntingly says, I'm doing my job, you gonna do yours? instead of I'm doing my job, how can I help you accomplish yours? It's a small shift in thinking with massive ramifications.
Maybe none of this even matters. All of this might be for naught if Koepka remains injured and doesn't play. It doesn't mean the malaise is eradicated, but it does mean one of this year's problems is certainly erased. And perhaps all of this is even a bit overstated. Perhaps Koepka is different behind closed doors than he is on magazine covers. Perhaps he is beloved by his teammates. Or perhaps the U.S. talent is so overwhelming that it covers up everything else.
However, we have a lot of evidence piled up that tells us this is not even a Koepka-centric issue. This has been plaguing the U.S. for years. How frustrating it must be, too, that it has never been an issue of talent or desire. Those are things that cannot be engineered. You can't make somebody a sharper iron player or a better putter or more competitive for one week. It would be less infuriating if those were the issues.
Instead, it's something the team has control of that has upended them. It is well within the ability of every single person in the room to choose to trust one another. Yet over and again they have chosen not to take that leap, not wholeheartedly anyway.
It might make them better suited for professional golf 51 weeks of the year, but for the seven days of the Ryder Cup, the results have often been a disaster.
© 2004-2021 CBS Interactive. All Rights Reserved.
CBS Sports is a registered trademark of CBS Broadcasting Inc. Commissioner.com is a registered trademark of CBS Interactive Inc.
Images by Getty Images and US Presswire
These cookies are essential for the proper functioning of our Services. Essential cookies cannot be switched off in our systems. You can set your device to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the Service will not work.
These Cookies allow us to collect information about how visitors use our properties. Some examples include counting visits and traffic sources, so we can measure and improve the performance of our services. If you do not allow these Cookies we will not know when users have visited our properties and will not be able to monitor performance.
These Cookies enable the services to provide enhanced functionality and personalization. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our services. If you do not allow these Cookies then some or all of these services may not function properly.
These Cookies may be set by us or through our services by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant advertising on this and on other properties. If you do not allow these Cookies, you will still see ads, but you will experience less relevant advertising.
These Cookies are set by a range of social media services that we have added to the services to enable you to share our content with your friends and networks. They are capable of tracking your browser across other sites, building up a profile of your interests to show you relevant content and advertisements on the relevant social networks. If you do not allow these Cookies you may not be able to use or see these sharing tools.
14 September, 2021 - 06:27am
It’s time to warn your bank account of an imminent raid and perform some ‘buying finger’ stretches, because the Apple event klaxon went off last week. Today, 14 September 2021 is the iPhone launch date, and everything kicks off at 10 PDT (6pm in the UK).
You can watch the event here:
So which Apple goodies will soon be freed into the wild? Only Tim Cook and his chums know for certain. But Stuff is wearing trademarked prediction pants, and has cranked up the rumour-rater to fling educated guesses in your general direction.
Stuff says: The mini reportedly sold poorly, because people have no taste – tsk – but we hope it sticks around. The rumoured feature set is sound, although we hope Apple goes further and welds Touch ID to the power button.
Likelihood: Assuming this is the iPhone 13 event (multiple autumn/fall Apple events are rumoured), new iPhones are a cert – unless Apple no longer likes money.
Stuff says: We’re all for new sensors – if they work. The heart rate one’s good. Oxygen? Not so much. As for a redesign, it’s about time (oho!), and bezel shrinkage should give us a larger display without the device itself growing. But we do hope existing straps remain compatible.
Likelihood: Apple releases new Apple Watches like clockwork (sorry). Assuming we get new iPhones on the 14th, we’ll get Apple Watches as well.
Stuff says: The idea of a dinky Air appeals, combining a lack of heft and larger display. It’d be ideal for media consumption. As for the iPad, rumours saying faster/skinner/lighter are less exciting, but it’ll nonetheless be great entry-level kit.
Likelihood: iPad and iPhone events rarely collide, but it’s possible Apple will do a mega-event this year. Mark this up as a mini maybe. And a quick wildcard: the 4th-gen iPad Air is a year old, so that might get a speed-bump too.
Stuff says: Apple’s never been scared of transforming mid-range kit into a ‘lite’ take on pro fare – look at 2020’s iPad Air. Even with a price-hike, ‘AirPods Almost Pro’ would fly off the shelves.
Likelihood: If AirPods 3 are to feature at an event, it’ll be one where a new iPhone rocks up – unless Apple has some other audio goodies up its sleeve.
Stuff says: Earlier this year, the iMac was the first M1 Mac to get a full revamp – the M1 MacBook Pro and M1 MacBook Air cases remained identical to their Intel predecessors. Pro Macs are surely next on the agenda – the only question is when?
Likelihood: It feels like a stretch to add Macs to an event already packed with new iPhones and iPads. All credit to Apple if that happens, but we suspect a standalone additional event is more likely when Apple next needs to bellow “Mac to the Future”!